Having sorted out the backs of the seats...........
One of the many points my tester raised was that the off-side rear suspension required considerable more force to compress than the near-side. Not a MOT fail but detrimental to handlng.
He said the shock absorbers must be miss-adjusted but my thoughts were that the springs themselves may be different rates. Am I off track?
Next question then....springs or shocks?
Moderator: Gavin McArdle
- Reddi-Eng
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:30 pm
- Mem No.: 2089
- Location: Worcestershire
Next question then....springs or shocks?
Regards,
Derek
_______________________________
Ex owner of 1973 Mk.III Invader PGY 161L
1988 GTM Rossa Mk.I
2010 Ford Fiesta Everyday Drive
Derek
_______________________________
Ex owner of 1973 Mk.III Invader PGY 161L
1988 GTM Rossa Mk.I
2010 Ford Fiesta Everyday Drive
- Admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:10 pm
- Mem No.: 0
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Next question then....springs or shocks?
Reddi-Eng wrote:He said the shock absorbers must be miss-adjusted but my thoughts were that the springs themselves may be different rates. Am I off track?
Not necessarily. The difference being that shocks will not support a load, only resist position change (unless they're or something else is seized).
Without resorting to spanners a simple test is apply the same load, slowly two both sides (one at a time) and measure the wheel deflection. In practical terms, on level ground, jack each wheel up by a set amount. If the deflection is wildly different from side to the other, the springs don't match.
-
alastair_james_cox
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 1:43 pm
- Mem No.: 2376
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests